I apologize if I offended you Mark. I never did say that Joe and George did not make serious contributions to fly fishing. I would say that George in fact was the most innovative American fly fishermen. I know that's going out on a limb. If you were to read my postings without getting upset, you would see that I simply stated that the European angler would beat someone fishing that same method.and for the record Joe is a good fisherman I am impressed with his skill level. What Torrey and I are saying is with some of the new things out there he would have been that much better. These things that we talk about only make a good angler even better.
About being slow to change thinking. There is nothing wrong with that. Joe and Geaorge taught 80,000 people how to fly fish at PSU according to what you posted. I am sure you can add tens of thousands nore just from classes, seminars and meeting people on the stream. I would bet that if they taught me directly, I would be skeptical of anyone elses thoughts, and you know what, that's ok and its loyalty at its best. I learned the same techniques when I was young from my grandpa, then I got into strike indicators, then I got into fishing weighted flies, and yes what Humphries does is very similar to the Czech/Polish method. That's why I was good at that one from the start.I am used to fishing with the Humphries technique and they are almost the same. The technique that I was most skeptical of were the European techniques believe it or not. I would call Torrey and Alain and say that's its crap and I am not going to bother with it. Then I tried it! That's all I am going to say about that! I think that you misunderstood my point here and I am sorry that you did so. By being slow to change, I did not mean less intelligent. I meant loyal to what they have been shown by to great anglers. I am sorry that you took it the wrong way and for offending some of you.